Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100!
Week 4 Assignment Apply Rubrics
Week 4 Assignment Apply Rubrics
Permalink: https://eaziessay.com/week-4-assignment-apply-rubrics/
Introduction to the Literature Review
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% | 2 Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% | 3 Satisfactory 79.00% | 4 Good 87.00% | 5 Excellent 100.00% | ||
70.0 %Content | ||||||
10.0 %Introduction | An introduction is not present. | An introduction is present, but it does not relate to the body of the paper. | An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. There is nothing in the introduction to entice the reader to continue reading. | An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction provides a weak incentive for the reader to continue reading. | An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction is intriguing and encourages the reader to continue reading. | |
15.0 %Synthesis of Research Questions | No synthesis of research questions is presented. | A synthesis of research questions is presented. However, the synthesis is not valid. | A cursory though valid synthesis of research questions is presented. | A moderately thorough and valid synthesis of research questions is presented. | A reflective and insightful synthesis of research questions is presented. | |
15.0 %Synthesis of Sample Populations | No synthesis of sample populations is presented. | A synthesis of sample populations is presented. However, the synthesis is not valid. | A cursory though valid synthesis of sample populations is presented. | A moderately thorough and valid synthesis of sample populations is presented. | A reflective and insightful synthesis of sample populations is presented. | |
15.0 %Synthesis of the Limitations of the Study | No synthesis of the limitations of the studies is presented. | A synthesis of the limitations of the studies is presented. However, the synthesis is not valid. | A cursory though valid synthesis of the limitations of the studies is presented. | A moderately thorough and valid synthesis of the limitations of the studies is presented. | A reflective and insightful synthesis of the limitations of the studies is presented. | |
15.0 %Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Research | No conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented. | A conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented. However, they are not valid. | A cursory though valid conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented. | A moderately thorough and valid conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented. | A reflective and insightful conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented. | |
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
10.0 %Format | ||||||
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |
100 %Total Weightage |