Qualitative Research Methods Assignment
Qualitative Research Methods Assignment
This is a follow-up to a previously submitted assignment-
https://www.homeworkmarket.com/questions/qualitative-research-methods-19157883
It is meant exclusively for Catherine Owens
Please use the attached templates, rubric and format to complete it.
ORDER ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE ESSAY PAPERS HERE
Constructing 10 Strategic Points
In a previous assignment you began working on the construction of 10 Strategic Points. These points will be used when developing your Prospectus and further developed into your Proposal and then finally in your dissertation. This assignment gives you experience in the development of 10 Strategic Points for a study that you could design to replicate the Clark & Springer study. Qualitative Research Methods Assignment
General Requirements:
1. Use “Constructing 10 Strategic Points” to complete this assignment.
2. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
3. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center. Qualitative Research Methods Assignment
4. Include a minimum of five scholarly topic-relevant sources (majority of articles should be published within past 5 years)
5. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Directions:
1. Review the 10 Strategic Points constructed in Week 2 and the Clark and Springer (2007) study. Additionally, review the feedback provided by the instructor.
2. Use “Constructing 10 Strategic Points” to develop 10 Strategic Points for a replication of the Clark & Springer study that you could design for an undergraduate psychology program. Be sure to use resources in the DC network>Research/Dissertation tab> Prospectus templates to review the criteria for the purpose, problem, research questions and other Strategic Points. Qualitative Research Methods Assignment
3. Use the prompts and suggestions contained in the template to guide your work.
-
Module5Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx
Rubic_Print_Format
Course Code Class Code RES-855 RES-855-O502 Constructing 10 Strategic Points 255.0 Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned Content 70.0% Identify 10 Strategic Points 18.0% All 10 points have not been identified. Discussion is not present. Not all 10 points have been identified. Discussion is incomplete. All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level. All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is detailed and mostly comprehensive. All 10 points have been identified. Discussion is thorough and comprehensive. Include Problem and Purpose Statement 18.0% Problem and purpose statement are not present. Problem and purpose statement are present, but incomplete. Problem and purpose statement are present, but done at a perfunctory level. Problem and purpose statement are present. Statements are detailed. Problem and purpose statement are present. Statements are comprehensive and astutely identified. Describe Phenomena 17.0% The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has not been identified. The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified, but is incomplete. The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified, but at a perfunctory level. The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified and discussion is detailed. The phenomena discussed by Clark and Springer has been identified and discussion is thorough and comprehensive. Describe Methodology, Instruments, and Data Analysis Approach 17.0% Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have not been identified. Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have been identified, but incomplete. Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have been identified, but at a perfunctory level. Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have been identified and discussion is detailed. Methodology, instruments, and data analysis approach have been identified and discussion is thorough and comprehensive. Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 20.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication. Format 10.0% Mechanics of Writing 5.0% Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. APA Format 5.0% Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication. Total Weightage 100% -
RES-855.Topic5Constructing10StrategicPoints.docx
College of Doctoral Studies
RES-855 Resource
© 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
-
RSD851-TheTenStrategicPoints.docx
10 Strategic Points
References
Augsberger, A., Yeung, A., Dougher, M., & Hahm, H. C. (2015). Factors influencing the underutilization of mental health services among Asian American women with a history of depression and suicide. BMC health services research, 15(1), 542. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-015-1191-7
Basu, S., Rehkopf, D. H., Siddiqi, A., Glymour, M. M., & Kawachi, I. (2016). Health behaviors, mental health, and health care utilization among single mothers after welfare reforms in the 1990s. American journal of epidemiology, 183(6), 531-538. https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/183/6/531/2195922
Blosnich, J. R., Marsiglio, M. C., Gao, S., Gordon, A. J., Shipherd, J. C., Kauth, M., … & Fine, M. J. (2016). Mental health of transgender veterans in US states with and without discrimination and hate crime legal protection. American journal of public health, 106(3), 534-540. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302981
De Luca, S. M., Blosnich, J. R., Hentschel, E. A., King, E., & Amen, S. (2016). Mental health care utilization: how race, ethnicity and veteran status are associated with seeking help. Community mental health journal, 52(2), 174-179. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10597-015-9964-3
Hamilton, J. E., Desai, P. V., Hoot, N. R., Gearing, R. E., Jeong, S., Meyer, T. D., … & Begley, C. E. (2016). Factors associated with the likelihood of hospitalization following emergency department visits for behavioral health conditions. Academic Emergency Medicine, 23(11), 1257-1266. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/acem.13044