NU560-8D-Unit 4 Assignment Literature Review
NU560-8D-Unit 4 Assignment Literature Review
Instructions
This is part 2 of your evidence-based practice project.
In this assignment, you will refer back to the topic you selected for your evidence-based practice problem from the identified list of topics provided by your course faculty in week 1 and the three articles selected from your week 2 assignment. NU560-8D-Unit 4 Assignment Literature Review
ORDER ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE ESSAY PAPERS HERE
For this assignment, you will interpret the three articles selected from your week 2 assignment. First, you must complete a matrix table for your three articles (see template provided below). Once you complete this matrix table, you will write a paper, including the following information:
- An introduction to the topic from week 2 and created PICOT question (although this information may be similar to what you provided in your week 2 assignment, be sure to paraphrase and not copy/paste directly from that assignment).
- For each of the three articles selected, describe the following:
- Concepts explored in the article/study (This is the “what” of the study.)
- Methods used in the article/study (Describe this in detail; it’s “how” of the study.)
- Participants in the article/study (This is the “who” of the study.)
- Instruments/tools in the student (This is the resources used to collect the data; i.e.; survey, interview, etc. Be sure to include a discussion of reliability and validity, as well.)
- Conclusion/summary of the evidence.
- Be sure to provide the matrix table at the end of your paper as an appendix; failure to include this at the end of the paper or at all will result in point deduction.
Remember to support your ideas with the articles you found. These articles should be less than five (5) years old. They should not be from the Web, but from the library databases, and be sure to use a narrative format.
In addition, you must follow APA guidelines, providing a title page, reference page, appendix, and in-text citations, as well as use level headings to match the assignment criteria listed above.
Please use, at minimum three scholarly references, and your paper should be 500-700 words, excluding title and reference pages and the matrix table.
Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.
Unit 4 Required Resources
- Gray, J. R., Grove, S. K. & Sutherland, S. (2017). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.) . St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders. ISBN 978-0-323-37758-4
- Review Chapter 2 pp. 33-34; Chapter 13
- University of Calfornia Berkeley (2016). Evaluating resources. (Links to an external site.)Berkeley Library. [Digital resource]. Retrieved from http://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/evaluating-resources
- This link provides information on ways to evaluate internet sources for authority and appropriateness to be included in scholarly research.
- Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Mazurek-Melynk, B., Williamon, K, M. (2010). Evidence based practice step by step (Links to an external site.). American Journal of Nursing , 110, 5. Retrieved from http://download.lww.com/wolterskluwer_vitalstream_com/PermaLink/NCNJ/A/NCNJ_546_156_2010_08_23_SADFJO_165_SDC216.pdf (Links to an external site.)
- University of Adelaide (2014). The JBI approach. (Links to an external site.) Joanna Briggs Institute. Retrieved from https://joannabriggs.org/
- (Links to an external site.)University of Minnesota (2017). Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations (Links to an external site.). UM Bio-Medical Library. Retrieved from https://hsl.lib.umn.edu/biomed/help/levels-evidence-and-grades-recommendations
- Evidence Based Health Care — Practice guidelines levels of evidence and grades of recommendations used by the National Guideline Clearinghouse.
- Uman, L. S. (2011). Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Links to an external site.). Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(1), 57–59. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3024725/ (Links to an external site.)
- Walden University (2019). Common assignments: Literature review matrix (Links to an external site.). [Website]. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview/matrix
-
Unit4MatrixTableTemplate.docxMatrix Table
Article/Reference (in APA format) Purpose of the Article/Study Question Variables (i.e.; Independent vs. Dependent) Study Design Sampling Methods Instrument Findings/Results -
NU560UNIT4RUBRIC.docx
NU 560 -Lit Review Rubric
NU 560 -Lit Review Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction NU560-CO1; PRICE-P
25 pts Above Expectations
Exquisitely states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.
21.25 pts Meets Expectations
Moderately states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.
18.75 pts Below Expectations
Minimally states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.
11.25 pts Expectations not addressed
Does not state purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.
25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody/Content NU560-CO1; NU560-CO3; NU560-CO5; NU560-CO6; PRICE-P; PRICE-I
25 pts Above Expectations
Conveys full understanding of the topic by fully addressing: Select appropriate sources of evidence to support your EBPG/Translational research problem and compose a literature review supporting your EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding your investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to your EBPG/Translational research proposal.
22.5 pts Meets Expectations
Conveys understanding of the topic by addressing: Select appropriate sources of evidence to support your EBPG/Translational research problem and compose a literature review supporting your EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding your investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to your EBPG/Translational research proposal.
20 pts Below Expectations
Conveys minimal understanding of the topic: Select appropriate sources of evidence to support your EBPG/Translational research problem and compose a literature review supporting your EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding your investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to your EBPG/Translational research proposal
17.5 pts Expectations not addressed
Does not address: Select appropriate sources of evidence to support your EBPG/Translational research problem and compose a literature review supporting your EBPG/Translational research proposal Include a discussion regarding your investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to your EBPG/Translational research proposal.
25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody/Organization NU560-CO6; PRICE-I
25 pts Above Expectations
• Organized throughout • Logical, clear sequence • Exhibits critical thinking • 4-5 pages (not including title page and reference page)
22.5 pts Meets Expectations
• Well organized • Easy to follow • Shows some original thought • 3-4 pages (not including title page and reference page)
20 pts Below Expectations
• Some organizational. problems • Shows little original thought • Less than 3pages (not including title page and reference page)
17.5 pts Expectations not addressed
• Difficult to follow • May jump topics • Shows little original thought • Less than 2 pages (not including title page and reference page)
25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelops paper/References NU560-CO1; PRICE-P
15 pts Above Expectations
Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 5 references used.
10.5 pts Meets Expectations
Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 4 references used.
9 pts Meets Expectations
Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 3 references used
7.5 pts Below Expectations
Less than 3 references.
15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA PRICE-P; PRICE-I
5 pts Above Expectations
Uses appropriate headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Uses correct APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references. No errors.
4.5 pts Meets Expectations
Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion or does not follow APA guidelines for headings. Uses APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references with 1-5 minor errors noted.
4 pts Below Expectations
Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Uses APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references with more than 5 errors noted.
3.5 pts Expectations not addressed
Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Does not adhere to APA guidelines.
5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Spelling PRICE-I; PRICE-P
5 pts Above Expectations
No errors noted.
4.5 pts Meets Expectations
1-2 grammar and/or spelling errors.
4 pts Below Expectations
3-4 grammar and/or spelling errors.
3.5 pts Expectations not addressed
More than 5 grammar and/or spelling errors.
5 pts Total Points: 100