NR 505 Entire Course Project Essay Latest
NR 505 Entire Course Project Essay Latest
NR 505 Week 1 Discussion Latest
Ask a PICO(T) Question (graded)
Write a quantitative research question using the PICO(T) model about a health or safety issue observed in the Iron ridge or Summerville community or your practice setting. Conduct a search of the literature for the quantitative research question. (Remember you can use this topic and quantitative research article as part of your Research Summary Table assignment).Provide a brief summary of your quantitative research article. You will not be able to see other’s posts for this forum until you have posted your response to the threaded discussion thread.
NR 505 Week 2 Discussion Latest
Theory and Variables (graded)
Review the differences in predictive and prescriptive studies and select a predictive or prescriptive article that you found in your literature search. What are the independent variables (IV), dependent variables (DV), and mediating variables (MVs) that you find in the article? How do determining IVs, DVs, and MVs help you discern the theory tested in the research? In your particular article, what risk factors are identified, or what recommendations are provided?
NR 505 Week 3 Discussion Latest
Plan a Qualitative Study (graded)
Write a qualitative research question using the PICO(T) model using the P (population), I (abstract concept), O (outcome), and T (time) from the PICO(T) model about an issue from your practice setting. Conduct a search of the literature for a qualitative research article that would answer your qualitative research question. What qualitative research design (Phenomenology, Grounded Theory, Ethnography) did you select and why? Provide a summary of the study. How will you make sure that the information you obtain is trustworthy? How is trustworthiness in qualitative research similar and different from reliability and validity?
NR 505 Week 4 Discussion Latest
Sampling Issues (graded)
What are the various types of sampling, along with their advantages and disadvantages? As we think about sampling and ethical practices, review these two documents on ethical issues in research: Tuskegee syphilis study at http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/ An overview of questionable studies: Resnik, D. (2012). Research ethics timeline (1932-present). Retrieved from http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm What are the implications of this information with respect to the recruitment of human subjects in a study related to your chosen issue?
NR 505 Week 5 Discussion Latest
Inferential Statistics (graded)
Complete a PICO(T) search on a topic that pertains to your practice setting. Select one of the articles from your search. Identify the descriptive statistics. Then describe the inferential tests that were used in the article (in other words, t-tests and chi-squares). Given the p-values related to the tests, how do you interpret the results? Are they statistically significant, also clinically significant? What are the recommendations based on this paper? Share some alternate explanations (mediating or intervening variables) for the results of the study. If your chosen study does not contain inferential tests, then choose a different article that does contain inferential tests so you can participate in the discussion.
NR 505 Week 6 Discussion Latest
Evidence-Based Models (graded)
Read the box above about Mr. Lowell and his facility. As an advanced practice nurse, you will looking at various evidence based practice models and choosing two of them to compare and contrast here. After you compare and contrast them, discuss which one you would recommend to this facility and why? Remember to support your posts with scholarly research in APA 6th ed format.
NR 505 Week 7 Discussion Latest
Quality, Safety, and Costs (graded)
Class, this week I would like for you to think about a patient scenario related to our Summerville scenario. Mr. Lowell is especially concerned about a costly high infection rate in surgical patients at St. Louis Medical Center, along with a lack of concern about patient’s psychological needs. He has read about the efforts of the QSEN Institute (http://qsen.org) to promote quality and safety. He was surprised to see that patient concerns are inherent in the quality improvement conversation. Place yourself in the role of nurse educator to help the new staff education director and the clinical practice council study both problems. How would you explain the relationships among quality, safety, and costs to the director and staff? How would you demonstrate the importance of nursing care in addressing this issue? What outcome variables would you recommend?
NR 505 Week 8 Discussion Latest
Applying Evidence-Based Practice (graded)
What specific skills and knowledge that you gained through this course will be most important as you plan and implement your practicum project? Describe a concrete way in which you anticipate using these skills and knowledge.
1 NR 505 Week 1 TII Draft Latest
Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Template
Using this worksheet which is based on the AGREE II instrument, evaluate your clinical practice guideline using these questions:
Domain I: Score and Purpose
· What is the overall objective of the guideline? What is the scope and purpose of this CPG?
· What health question(s) are covered by the guideline? Be specific.
· Who is the target population (patients, public, consumers, students, etc.) to whom the guideline is meant to apply? Who are the recipients of the services outlined in the document?
Domain 2: Stakeholder Involvement
· What professions are represented in the guideline development group?
· How well were the target populations’ views and preferences considered and sought?
Domain 3: Rigor of Development
· What systematic methods were used to search for evidence to develop the CPG?
· What were the criteria for selecting the evidence?
· What are the strengths and limitations of the body of evidence used to develop the CPG?
· How were health benefits, side effects, and risks considered in developing the CPG?
· What explicit link is present between the recommendations and the supporting evidence?
· How was the CPG externally reviewed by experts prior to its publication?
· What procedure is in place for updating the CPG?
Domain 4: Clarity and presentation
· What key recommendations are presented? How specific and unambiguous are the recommendations? How easily identifiable where these recommendations?
· What are the different options for managing the condition or health issue presented in the CPG? How clearly are they presented in the CPG?
Domain 5: Applicability
· What facilitators and barriers to the application of the CPG?
· How did the CPG provide advice and/or tools on the application of the recommendation into practice?
· What potential resource implications of applying the recommendations have been considered?
· What key monitoring and/or auditing criteria are presented in the CPG?
Domain 6: Editorial independence
· How ere the views of the funding body kept from influencing the content of the guideline?
· What conflicts of interest are possible?
· How are the competing interests of the CPG group members recorded and addressed?
Summary
· Does the CPG answer the key clinical questions presented in the CPG?
· How will you, as the advanced practice nurse, apply this CPG in practice?
NR 505 Week 3 Portfolio Assignment 1 Latest
Research Summary Table
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to assimilate, analyze, critique, and summarize original research articles. In other words, select a report of a single, original study.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
(CO 2) Formulate and analyze nursing/clinical problems related to nursing and other disciplines. (PO 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3
Total Points Possible: 165 Points
Requirements
Through this assignment, the student will
1. Conduct a systematic search of relevant databases to find research-based evidence related to a nursing problem (CO 2);
2. Construct a summary table of four peer-reviewed quantitative single original studies, indicating the purpose, sample, design/level of evidence, findings, and limitations of each (CO 3); and
3. Summarize the findings of the four studies as a whole (CO 3).
Preparing the Table
Conduct a PICO(T) search on the nursing problem related to your practice setting. Select the four most recent peer-reviewed studies that describe original research in a single study (do not select a meta-analysis, systematic review of research, or integrative literature review). Refer to the Types of Articles Found in the Nursing and Health care document in the Course Resource section to make sure that you are using the correct document.
Construct a table summarizing the four most credible and recent studies, using the Research Summary template on the next page (also found in Course Resource Section). Analyze each article and provide the following information in brief format: purpose of the study; type of sample and number of participants; design of the study, along with the level of evidence; findings of the study; and limitations of the study.
Preparing the Summary
Briefly (4-6 pages; not including cover page and reference page(s)) summarize the results of the four studies as a whole. Follow this outline:
I. In a short paragraph, restate your research question and describe your search strategy. (10 points)
II. Analysis of the designs used in the studies presented in your research summary table. (10 points)
III. Where do these studies fall on the Levels of Evidence table? What is the significance of this information?(10 points)
IV. Based on these studies, what are the findings? What is the answer to the research question? How well do the studies answer or fail to answer the question? Provide rationale to support your answer.(10 points)
V. How was each sample selected and how many participants in the studies? Is this number adequate? Why or why not? (10 points)
VI. Overall, what are the limitations of the study, and how can these limitations be overcome in subsequent studies? (10 points)
VII. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice or an idea for practice? Why or why not? Please provide a rationale for your answer.(10 points)
Provide your references, formatted in APA style, after the summary. Include the doi number for each article. Submit a permalink of each article you have chosen for this assignment (directions on how to obtain a permalink are located in the Course Resource section).
Instructions for setting up your paper in APA 6th edition format.
Look at the example document for this assignment. Start your paper as you would other APA 6thedition format professional papers. Copy and paste the table into your APA paper. This should allow your paper to remain in a vertical format. Your paper should be one document.
NR 505 Week 5 Portfolio Assignment 3 Latest
Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR)
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide students with practice in identifying, reading, and critiquing systematic research reviews related to nursing. A systematic review is defined as “A summary of evidence, typically conducted by an expert or expert panel on a particular topic, that uses a rigorous process (to minimize bias) for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing studies to answer a specific clinical question and draw conclusions about the data gathered (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt,2011, p.582).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)
(CO 4) Compare and critique quantitative and qualitative designs and methodologies for research studies. (PO 4, 7, 9, 11)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5
Total Points Possible: 175 Points
Requirements:
1. Choose an SRR that pertains to your practice setting. Describe the relevance of the nursing research problem addressed in a SRR to practice. (CO 3, 6)
2. Critique the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR, specifically the designs of the studies included. (CO 6)
3. Critique the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. (CO 6)
4. Describe the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR. (CO 3, 6)
5. Critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research. (CO 3, 6)
6. Utilize the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to locate a true SRR for this assignment.
7. Paper length should be between 4-6 pages (not including cover page and reference page(s).
Preparing the paper
Consult your faculty member if you are uncertain about whether your article is a true SRR. If it is not, your grade will be affected because you will not be able to address all of the above objectives.
Important: Submit a copy of the permalink for the article that you are critiquing by placing it on your reference page underneath your references. This will help TurnItIn from returning a high similarity percentage on your written work. Remember to keep TurnItIn similarity to 24% or less.
References
Melnyk, B.M., & Fine out-Over Holt, E. (2011).Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare (2nded.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams,& Wilkins.
Turnitin®
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin. You learned about Turnitin in your NR500 course, so you should be familiar with how to access it. Additionally, you will find an instructional announcement about Turnitin® in the course and in the Student Handbook.
| Category | Points | % | Description |
| Describes the relevance of the research problem addressed in the SRR to practice. | 25 | 14.28 | Fully describes the relevance of the research problem |
| Critiques the research rigor of the SRR article. | 25 | 14.28 | Fully critiques the rigor of the SRR article |
| Critiques the level of evidence identified by the type of studies used within the SRR | 25 | 14.28 | Fully critiques the level of evidence identified by the type of studies used within the SRR |
| Critiques the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. | 25 | 14.28 | Fully describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued |
| Describes the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR. | 25 | 14.28 | Fully describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR |
| Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research | 25 | 14.28 | Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for current practice and future research |
| Grammar, punctuation, and spelling reflect format written work. | 10 | 5.71 | Grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with rules for formal written work. |
| APA formatting | 10 | 5.71 | APA formatting is correct |
| Submit the permalink of the systematic research article you are critiquing. | 5 | 2.85 | Submits the permalink of the systematic research article that you are critiquing |
| 175 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
NR 505 Week 7 Portfolio Assignment 4 Latest
Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for students to apply and disseminate information based on practice summaries. The most common type of practice summary in healthcare is the clinical practice guideline (CPG).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 9); and
(CO 6) Utilize the principles of evidence-based practice to propose strategies that can address nursing issues (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9).
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
Total Points Possible: 200 Points
Requirements:
Through this assignment, the student will Develop summary of a clinical practice guideline. (COs 3, 6)
Preparing the paper
You will develop a summary that you could use within an evidence-based practice (EBP) committee or related venue to share with your colleagues. This paper will be5 – 6pages in length.
· Select a clinical practice guidelines that addresses an issue pertinent to your practice setting.
· Search the literature and evidence-based practice websites and databases to find a recent clinical practice guideline (no more than 5 years) related to the issue you select. The course Webliography provides websites where you can find clinical practice guidelines, but there are many others available in specialty-organization websites.
· Analyze and critique the clinical practice guideline. Use the Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Template in Course Resources to develop your paper. Components include:
o scope and purpose of the clinical practice guidelines;
o stakeholder involvement;
o rigor of development; o clarity and presentation
o applicability
o editorial independence
·Attach URL address of the Clinical Practice Guidelines on the reference page of your paper.
·Note: Thetemplate isan outline to assist you in setting up your paper so you will be sure to address those topics in your paper in addition to other information to meet the criteria for this assignment. Your paper should be in APA 6th ed format. Do not copy and paste the template into your paper.