Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

Meaning-Making Forum 3 (Week 6)

Meaning-Making Forums 1-4 are this course’s unique final project. Be fully engaged in Phase Three! After reviewing the readings, presentations, lecture notes, articles, and web-engagements, and previous assignments, artificially move your predetermined careseeker (i.e., Crossroads’ Careseekers: Bruce, Joshua, Brody, Justin, or Melissa) through Phase Three. Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

ORDER ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE ESSAY PAPERS HERE

NOTE: These research-based forums require that you draw upon ALL of the course readings and learning activities to date, in order to substantively develop each phase in our Solution-based, Short-term, Pastoral Counseling (SbStPC) process.  Noticeably support each core assertion.

  • Rapport and Relational Alignment. Briefly explain how you will maintain rapport and check your relational alignment (i.e., use DISC language) in order to support forward progress.
  • Phase Three Distinctive Features. Narrate movement of careseeker through Phase Three’s distinctive features (i.e., purpose, goal, chief aim, role/responsibility, use of guiding assumptions) and apply pertinent insights and techniques from ALL the readings, previous assignments, and the Bible.
  • Supportive Feedback Break. When resistance and/or relapse are experienced or expressed, what particular question(s), wise counsel, action step(s), and/or biblical insight(s) from Solution-focused Pastoral Counseling and the Quick Reference Guide might be utilized to consolidate forward progress?
  • Phase Three Marker. Describe a marker that indicates the careseeker is ready to move into Phase Four. In light of your careseeker’s particular need, how might the Common Sense Test support forward progress?
  • FOOD for Thought? In the event blaming presents, what question(s) and/or technique(s) might be used to help your careseeker gain perspective and forward progress?

TIPS:

  • Carefully Follow Meaning-Making Forum Guidelines & Tips!
  • Make sure to use headings (5) so that the most inattentive reader may easily follow your thoughts.
  • Use the annotated outline approach. Bullets should have concise, complete, well-developed sentences or paragraphs.
  • Foster a “noble-minded” climate for investigating claims through well-supported core assertions (i.e., consider the validation pattern of the Bereans; Acts 17:11).  Noticeably support assertions to facilitate further investigation and to avoid the appearance of plagiarism.
  • Since you have the required materials (e.g., Masterpiece), abridge any related citations (Nichols, p. 12) and do not list the required source in a References’ section.
  • Secondary sources must follow current APA guidelines for citations and References.
  • Make every effort to prove that you care about the subject matter by proofreading to eliminate grammar and spelling distractions.

A substantive thread (at least 450 words)

  • attachment

    PACO500_SbStPC_Handout_202020B1.docx

    PACO 500

    Solution-based Short-term Pastoral Counseling (SbStPC) Handout

    [All Website Links were last reviewed 10/31/2019]

    Note: In order to satisfactorily complete Meaning-Making Forums 1-4, remain closely connected to this handout, required readings, lectures, and previous learning activities. For future reference, journal on this handout as you engage subject matter. Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

    Aim to become very familiar with all content and websites as soon as possible. You are expected to draw upon this framework and integrate pertinent insights from ALL required course materials into each thread (see Course Schedule and Meaning-Making Forum Guidelines & Rubric).

    All of PACO 500’s readings and learning activities attempt to provide language and skills for becoming an effective and efficient people-helper. As a required resource, this handout provides a rationale for using SbStPC along with an overview of its counseling process and skills for developing related competencies.

     

    1. In what ways does a solution-based, short-term strategy become a value-added to a student-minister’s counseling experience?

    · SbStPC uses a collaborative methodology to align with God’s intentions (Kollar, 2011, p. 57). In the process of understanding the problem/issue affecting the care-seeker’s life, the student-counselor will come to realize that s/he is not the game-changer. Instead, the collaborative relationship (i.e., the counselor, counselee, Word of God, and Wonderful Counselor) utilized empowers “relocation” (i.e., a purposeful process of moving from where one is to where one needs to be under the dominion and direction of a well-defined guiding purpose statement; Rice, 2005). Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

    · In no fashion is a problem or issue ignored or minimized; in fact, the opposite is true. Problem description requires teamwork. Kollar (2011) identifies the action of problem description, goal formulation, and vision clarification as a co-creative methodology between the Holy Spirit, counselor, and counselee (p. 57).

    · In the first phase of the counseling process, the student-counselor is prompted to actively listen to the Holy Spirit and counselee. This timely partnership enhances the counselor’s ability to understand the problem being described. That is, to “get” what it is, when it is most often and least often present, and how it threatens who or what is important to the care-seeker.

    · When a problem is satisfactorily understood, a goal/solution may be collaboratively developed along with a describable, measurable, and repeatable plan of action to move out and away from the problem.

    · The SbStPC process does not assume the care-seeker can move toward the goal alone. Upon finding the keys to solution, effort is made to identify and secure partners to support care-seeker’s forward progress.

    · Unlike problem-focused approaches which require more time, SbStPC manages the counseling process effectively and efficiently with its brief (e.g., 3–5 sessions), time-limited (e.g., 50–90-minute time frame per session), focused (e.g., identifiable phases within the counseling process; see “Hawkins Analysis Grid” and “Core Competency Two: Developing Your Style to Connect with People” – Ch.3 in Dr. Younce’s dissertation below) boundaries.

    · SbStPC challenges the student-minister to rethink existing paradigms and to value each care-seeker as a fellow image-bearer. This reflection often cultivates the essential interpersonal skills (i.e., empathetic, considerate, authentic) to flex with a care-seeker’s fallen-ness without compromising truth and grace.

    · As with any effective people-helping strategy, a significant emphasis is placed on interpersonal skill development. SbStPC learning activities provide students with language to discuss what makes them tick and become ticked off. Gaining language to describe human behavior, along with corresponding people-helping skills, facilitates rapport building and cultivates a context for change.

    · SbStPC challenges each student-minister to operate under the authority of the Word of God, in the power of the Holy Spirit, within a community of accountability for the purpose of intentionally pursing the imitation of Christ and moving others toward faith in and imitation of Christ.

    · Take this discussion further and review a fellow Liberty University student’s doctoral dissertation which captured much of SbStPC’s competency based approach:

    The Significance of Developing Core Counseling Competencies in Pastoral Care Ministry

     

     

    2. Are we to assume that similar theoretical monikers such as solution-focused brief therapy and Kollar’s (2011) solution-focused pastoral counseling are just different names for this course’s Solution-Based, Short-term Pastoral Counseling?

    Not at all! Solution-Focused Brief Therapy is a secular theory which primarily houses solution-focused and brief therapy approaches, both of which are secular theories. The use of “solution-based” rather than “solution-focused” permits us to move away from a “one theory serves all” orientation and meaningfully develop an eclectic (i.e., wise integration of contributions from other theories such as cognitive behavioral therapy, rational emotive behavioral therapy, strategic therapy, etc.; see Kollar’s ch. 18 discussion of theories and tasking) and biblically responsible counseling approach that goes beyond Kollar’s primary focus on behavior. Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

     

    The goal of Solution-Based, Short-term Pastoral Counseling (SbStPC) seeks to resource the helping relationship under the dominion and direction of a guiding purpose–being and becoming more like Christ in every relational context. This approach is soundly informed by the Word of God, conspicuously enriched by truth, grace, mercy, and assertive wisdom, empowered by the person and work of the Holy Spirit, and effectively managed within a faith-based community of accountability.

     

    SbStPC addresses the needs of the whole person and acknowledges our profoundly fallen human condition. Additionally, it asserts that the ultimate source of profound change/healing is the redemptive work of our God and Savior Jesus Christ. Correspondingly, as commentary is received from various disciplines, all material is carefully sifted and sorted through a biblical lens. Therefore, it is essential to understand that PACO 500 uses a Solution-Based, Short-term Pastoral Counseling process rather than a solution-focused process.

     

    3. What are the distinctive features in our SbStPC strategy?

    Markers useful for locating one’s self within the fluidity of the counseling session are identified as distinctive features: purpose, goal, chief aim, role/responsibility, behavioral position, and guiding assumptions.

    · Phase One Purpose: Get the Care-seeker’s Present Story (Session One)

    · Goal: Problem description

    · Chief Aim: Listen Well

    · Role/responsibility: Counselor builds rapport/demonstrates fit (i.e., via attentive listening, counselor identifies with and validates concerns)>Counselee talks>Counselor actively listens for Counselee’s description/understanding of life with the problem

    · Behavioral Positions: attending, blaming, or willing

    · Guiding Assumption(s)?

    · Memorize Kollar’s Guiding Assumptions. Just like with Scripture, the Holy Spirit can bring these truth-based principles to mind at just the right time (Jn. 14:26).

    · Consider this Pastoral Counselor’s dilemma: Careseeker is awfulizing and seems stuck in a going nowhere cycle. What do I need to remember? “God is already active in the counselee” and “Finding exceptions help create solutions” (Kollar, 2011, p. 62–67). The careseeker is so stuck s/he cannot see God’s previous involvement. I need to look for clues of God’s involvement. Finding exceptions to the problem will likely reveal a coping skill that has been overlooked. Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

    · Key Insight to Remember: Until you are invited into the Care-seeker’s world and commit to counseling, you must remain in Phase One. If you are invited, do make sure that you can commit and have the assurance that you are fit and able to do good and no harm. If there is any doubt, it would be wise to refer to another people helper. Counselee remains in Phase One as long as s/he is in attending position. A blamer can move forward but will be a “lamer” until a realistic perspective can be gained. Once a truth-based reality can be developed, the lamer will become a gamer and move toward responsibility and the willing position.

    · Phase Two Purpose: Develop the Care-seeker’s Preferred Story/Solution (Session Two)

    · Goal: Goal formulation

    · Chief Aim: Collaborate well

    · Role/responsibility: Counselor builds rapport/demonstrates fit (i.e., via attentive listening, counselor identifies with and validates concerns)>Counselee sets the direction and Counselor tacks with counselee’s process and collaboratively tests counselee’s notions for reality/do-ability

    · Behavioral position: must achieve a willing position

    · Guiding Assumption(s)?

    · Memorize Kollar’s Guiding Assumptions. Just like with Scripture, the Holy Spirit can bring these truth-based principles to mind at just the right time (Jn. 14:26).

    · Key Insight to Remember: Counselee is not in a willing position and ready to move into Phase 3 until a goal has been satisfactorily described and developed. The Miracle Question is a timely collaborative tool to cultivate a forward look with life without the problem.

    · Preferred Story/Solution is shaped by the Common Sense Test: Counselor will foster solution-based perspectives when focused on Kollar’s (2011/1997) basic tenets:

    Tenet One – “If it’s not broken, don’t fix it!”

    Tenet Two – “Once you know what works, do more of it!”

    Tenet Three – “If it’s not working, do something different!” (pp. 82–84)

    · Phase Three Purpose: Clarify and Execute Action Plan (Session Three)

    · Goal: Vision (i.e., goal) Clarification

    · Chief Aim: Execute well

    · Role/Responsibility: Counselor builds rapport/demonstrates fit (i.e., via attentive listening, counselor identifies with and validates concerns)>Counselor and Counselee actively participate in building hope and supporting forward progress

    · Behavioral position: forward progress requires a willing position to be maintained

    · Guiding Assumption(s)?

    · Memorize Kollar’s Guiding Assumptions. Just like with Scripture, the Holy Spirit can bring these truth-based principles to mind at just the right time (Jn. 14:26).

    · Key Insight to Remember: Small concrete steps lead to small changes which eventually generate bigger changes. As forward progress is achieved, consolidate it with supportive feedback. Be prepared to use the supportive feedback technique as well as other SbStPC core skills when the sameness of life is encountered, resistance is experienced or expressed, and relapse is likely. It would be wise to collaboratively think about supporting the change process with accountability. This notion may become part of tasking after the break. Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

    · Helping Strategy must pass the Common Sense Test: Counselor will cultivate a solution-based paradigm when focused on Kollar’s (2011/1997) basic tenets:

    Tenet One – “If it’s not broken, don’t fix it!”

    Tenet Two – “Once you know what works, do more of it!”

    Tenet Three – “If it’s not working, do something different!” (pp. 82–84)

    · Phase Four Purpose: Connect Care-seeker to Community (Session Four)

    · Goal: Consolidate and Support Change

    · Chief Aim: Connect well

    · Role/Responsibility: Counselee commits to a community of accountability directed at preferred story during & after the process of dishabituation of unhealthy patterns and re-habituation of healthy patterns. Counselor reinforces commitment to change through supportive feedback and by arranging accountability through pastoral care and small group ministries in soul-care context.

    · Behavioral position: willingness and forward progress are maintained through meaningful support

    · Guiding Assumption(s)?

    · Memorize Kollar’s Guiding Assumptions. Just like with Scripture, the Holy Spirit can bring these truth-based principles to mind at just the right time (Jn. 14:26).

    · Key Insight to Remember: Be proactive with efforts to successfully disengage. If you prepare ahead of time to meaningfully connect with responsible community, s/he will likely maintain forward progress.

     

    How will you evaluate a “successful disengagement” from the counseling scenario? If the counselee comments more on what he was able to accomplish with the resources provided, rather than you, then s/he is probably moving out and away from the problem with a high level of ownership. However, as you disengage, do not disconnect as pastoral care will continue to be needed to maintain forward progress.

    · Accountability must continue to reinforce the Common Sense Test: Appreciative helpers/hopers need to foster solution-based perspective and practice Kollar’s (2011/1997) basic tenets:

    Tenet One – “If it’s not broken, don’t fix it!”

    Tenet Two – “Once you know what works, do more of it!”

    Tenet Three – “If it’s not working, do something different!” (pp. 82–84)

     

    4. Do we have to create our own guiding assumptions or can we adopt/adapt Kollar’s Guiding Assumptions?

    It would be wise to start with Kollar’s nine guiding assumptions (ch. 7). To create an appreciation for each assumption, write a brief explanation describing what it means to you. A pertinent example would help anchor the assumption as well. Consider Kollar’s discussion of remaining in agreement with the intent of the Holy Spirit. Assumptions are part of our SbStPC methodology for co-creating perspectives, solutions, and strategies in session with the Holy Spirit, counselor, and counselee (Kollar, 2011, p. 57). Meaning-Making Forum 3 Wk6

     

    Other assumptions to consider from Competent Christian Counseling (2002, p. 351)

    1. All people are created in the image of God and, as his image bearers, have infinite value and worth.

    2. All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23).

    3. For God so loved the world, that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life (John 3:16, WEB).

    4. The most effective pastoral counseling takes into account the whole person: body, soul, and spirit.

    5. Different approaches can be helpful with different kinds of people struggling with different kinds of problems.

    6. People have various strengths and resources to help them solve their problems.

    7. Small changes are all that are necessary. Small changes lead to large changes. A change in one part of a system usually leads to a change in other parts of the system.

    8. Problems are solved; people are not cured.

    9. Change is inevitable, growth is optional

     

    5. In what ways might we apply insights from Clinton & Hawkins’ Quick Reference Guide in the SbStPC structure?

    Look at the section labeled “Using the Quick Reference Guide to Biblical Counseling” (pp. 10-11).

    Phase One: Getting the Present Story (Consider: Prayer Starter; Portraits; Definitions & Key Thoughts; Assessment)

    Phase Two: Developing the Preferred Story (Consider: Prayer Starter; Assessment; Wise Counsel; Biblical Insights)

    Phase Three: Clarifying and Executing the Action Plan (Consider: Prayer Starter; Wise Counsel; Action Steps; Biblical Insights; Recommended Resources)

    Phase Four: Consolidating and Supporting Change (Consider repeating Phase Three application)

    6. What are the key skills most often associated with SbStPC?

    In addition to insights gleaned from Nichols’ Masterpiece (2017), Petersen’s (2015) Why Don’t We Listen Better? and Kollar’s (2011) Solution Focused Pastoral Counseling, consider the following web resources.

  • attachment

    PACO500_Meaning-Making_Forum_Rubric_202020B1.docx

    PACO 500

    Meaning-Making Forum Rubric (Based on 125 Point Total)

    Criteria Levels of Achievement    
    Criteria Advanced 92-100 (A- to A):

    Satisfies criteria w/ excellence

    Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+) :

    Satisfies Criteria

    Developing (C- to C+):

    Satisfies most criteria

    Below Expectations (F to D+):

    Does not satisfy criteria

    Not Present Points

    Earned

    Content 70% (87.5 pts.)          
    Thread

     

    65-70 pts.

    · All key components of the Meaning-Making Forum prompt are answered in the thread.

    · The thread has a clear, logical flow. All major points are stated clearly.

    · All major points are supported by required evidence-based sources/readings to date and good examples or thoughtful analysis.

     

    59-64 pts.

    · All key components of the Meaning-Making Forum prompt are answered in the thread.

    · The thread has a logical flow. Most major points are stated.

    · Most major points are supported by required evidence-based sources/readings to date and examples or analysis.

    53-58 pts.

    · The Meaning-Making Forum prompt is addressed.

    · The thread lacks flow and content. Major points are unclear or confusing.

    · Major points include minimal examples or analysis.

    1-52 pts.

    · The Meaning-Making Forum prompt is addressed minimally or not at all.

    · The thread lacks content. Major points are unclear, confusing or not discussed at all.

    · Major points are not supported by examples or analysis.

     

    0 points  
    Reply

     

    16.5-17.5 pts.

    · One Reply with Quote directly addresses a related thread.

    · The reply is a significant contribution supported by at least 1 required evidence-based source, thoughtful analysis of subject matter and thread.

    15.5 pts.

    · One Reply with Quote directly addresses a related thread.

    · The reply is a contribution that reflects evidence-based thoughtful analysis of subject matter and thread.

    13.5-14.5 pts.

    · One Reply with Quote addresses a related thread.

    · The reply lacks flow and content. Reply is unclear or confusing.

    1-12.5 pts.

    · One Reply with Quote marginally addresses a related thread.

    · The reply lacks relevancy or clarity.

    0 points  

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Structure 30% (37.5 pts.)          
    Organization / Style/Sources

     

    23-25 pts.

    · The thread is presented with appropriate headings in bold, annotated outline with concise sentences, and organizational clarity.

    · Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is met or exceeded.

    · The reply contains a salutation and meets or exceeds 150 word count.

    · Required sources/readings to date are noticeably present with appropriate APA or Turabian citations/references with format errors.

    21-22 pts.

    · The thread is presented with most headings in bold, annotated outline with sentences, but slightly lacking organizational clarity.

    · Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is met or exceeded.

    · The reply contains a salutation and meets or exceeds 150 word count.

    · Required sources/readings to date are noticeably present with appropriate APA or Turabian citations/references with minimal format errors.

    19-20 pts.

    · The thread is presented with partial headings, without annotated outline and/or clear sentences, and/or lacks organizational clarity.

    · Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is met or exceeded.

    · The reply does not contain a salutation and/or meet 150 word count.

    · Most required sources/readings to date are present yet reflect several APA or Turabian citations/references errors.

    1-18 pts.

    · The thread is presented without headings and/or clear sentences, and lacks organizational clarity.

    · Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is not met or exceeded.

    · The reply does not contain a salutation and meet 150 word count.

    · Three or more required sources to date are not present; Sources present lack appropriate APA or Turabian citations/references.

    0 points  
     

    Grammar/

    Spelling

     

    11.5-12.5 pts.

    · Spelling, grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.

    · Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.

     

    9.5-10.5 pts.

    · Sentences are reasonably complete, clear, and concise. Minor issues with proofreading/editing are noted.

    · Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.

     

    8.5 pts.

    · Sentences are less complete, clear, and concise. More pervasive / significant issues with proofreading / editing are noted.

    · Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.

     

    1-7.5 pts.

    · Writing is not at the graduate level. It was clear that the work had not been edited or proofread. Multiple issues are noted.

    · Run-on paragraphs are observed. Sentence structure is not varied.

     

    0 points  
    Total / 125

     

    Page 2 of 2