Assignment: Evaluation EN111 Unit 1 Assessment
Assignment: Evaluation EN111 Unit 1 Assessment
Let’s imagine you are a college instructor! Congratulations! Now it’s time to get to work. Your students have submitted research papers in APA style. Using the Purdue OWL website (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., the APA Style website (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and/or the Herzing library APA resources, identify at least 8 APA formatting errors in the student paper below. Assignment: Evaluation EN111 Unit 1 Assessment
Explain each error in a numbered list, using full sentences for each.
After you complete your assignment in a Word document, save your work, and then you will need to attach the completed document to your submission. The process will be similar to making an attachment to an e-mail:
· Click Submit Assignment (upper right corner)
· Under Attach File, click on “Browse My Computer.”
· Look up your saved document, and click “Open.”
· Click “Submit.”
Your assignment submission should be a Word document that fully adheres to the instructions listed above. Be sure to proofread your assignment.
Assignment File(s)
111 Unit 1 Assessment – APA Formatting: You’re the Instructor
EN111 Unit 1 Assessment – APA Formatting: You’re the Instructor |
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
EN111-CO1 |
42.0 pts
Level 5
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner. |
38.0 pts
Level 4
Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas. |
34.0 pts
Level 3
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses these area. |
29.0 pts
Level 2
Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas. |
25.0 pts
Level 1
Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner. |
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions |
|
42.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology |
18.0 pts
Level 5
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements. |
16.0 pts
Level 4
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements. |
14.0 pts
Level 3
Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements. |
12.0 pts
Level 2
Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements. |
10.0 pts
Level 1
Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements. |
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements. |
|
18.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting |
10.0 pts
Level 5
The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling. |
9.0 pts
Level 4
The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication. |
8.0 pts
Level 3
The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication |
7.0 pts
Level 2
The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication. |
6.0 pts
Level 1
The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning. |
0.0 pts
Level 0
The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning. |
|
10.0 pts |
Total Points: 70.0 |
Previous Next